Case reports are always great because you have an individual profile of the person in question and it adds so much context.
I'm going through that study on spike in the blood of post-vaccine myocarditis adolescents, and whenever there's a panel I always wonder "who's immune profile is this? Is the person with the elevated neutrophil count the same as the person with the super high IL-6?" This is critical for outliers, because in many cases outliers are what drive statistical significance in studies, so knowing why some people are outliers are always important as well.
The closest one I've ever seen was one longitudinal study where they traced individuals over the course of a year or so and provided individual profiles for each participant. I haven't seen any study coming close to providing that intimate of a study aside from case reports.
It's definitely interesting. It gets as close to individual profiles as we can get, but it still doesn't provide any demographic data so that means no comorbidities or any other variables.
It's a shame, because these are things we should be getting as it relates to the vaccines.
I actually began the compilation trying to find case reports of myocarditis & clotting that were available while the FDA was still saying "nothing to see here" about both (& they're still denying clotting lol)
I was expecting t maybe find 50, 100 overall - case reports are rare in the best of times, and back then the anti-anti-vaccine pressures & censorship were in their glorious heyday.
Once I got past 200 - easily - it became a project of how many are actually out there - with massive #'s of case reports, you can do a lot more with them, both to help clinicians treating vaccine injuries, and different types of analyses.
What you said about the advantages of case reports studies over other types of studies is absolutely true. There is so much you can learn from a detailed, in-depth clinical narrative. They also reveals a lot about the mindset of mainstream medicine, such as the sheer deranged insanity of doctors who "rechallenge" patients AFTER they suffered a SEVERE adverse event/injury from the prior dose.
(I have a running series on these case reports, called "Vaccine Roulette" to try and highlight this blatant, egregious & profound lapse of foundational medical ethics, there are literally dozens and dozens of them. I have a list of CR's queued up for further installments after these:
Fantastic work. I'm curious though, did you do this all by hand, copying and pasting into the spreadsheet?
I wish my scripting skills were up to snuff, as I think something like autohotkey or a webscraper could have helped made this effort a bit less tedious.
Great crosspost drawing attention to Ash's tireless and all consuming work. 🙏🙏🙏👍 He hasn't gotten the attention that he deserves, but he has been just as dedicated and accurately detailed as Jess Rose, Midwestern Doc, Metatron, Matt Crawford, Igor, El Gato, Katherine Watt and Dr Arkamedic.
Big Pharma rewards their most compliant servants in government with lucrative executive positions in a grand revolving door scheme.
This incestuous relationship means that nothing the FDA puts out is trustworthy and must be discounted until proven by other, non-biased sources.
To put it bluntly, the FDA (as well as the CDC) are generally boldfaced liars putting out dangerous disinformation designed to benefit Big Pharma and harmful to the public until proven otherwise!
They consistently downplay the value of case reports in their attempt to obfuscate the truth about the danger and ineffectiveness of toxic pharmaceutical products.
To get to the "truth" of any health issue demands research into alternative sources.
Great work. Answers and questions could be found in each individual case of the suffering of an individual human being that are hidden when aggregated into statistics.
Case reports are always great because you have an individual profile of the person in question and it adds so much context.
I'm going through that study on spike in the blood of post-vaccine myocarditis adolescents, and whenever there's a panel I always wonder "who's immune profile is this? Is the person with the elevated neutrophil count the same as the person with the super high IL-6?" This is critical for outliers, because in many cases outliers are what drive statistical significance in studies, so knowing why some people are outliers are always important as well.
The closest one I've ever seen was one longitudinal study where they traced individuals over the course of a year or so and provided individual profiles for each participant. I haven't seen any study coming close to providing that intimate of a study aside from case reports.
https://moderndiscontent.substack.com/p/infection-insights-from-a-covid-longitudinal
Ooh that longitudinal study looks like an interesting one. Thanks!
It's definitely interesting. It gets as close to individual profiles as we can get, but it still doesn't provide any demographic data so that means no comorbidities or any other variables.
It's a shame, because these are things we should be getting as it relates to the vaccines.
Thank you.
FDA cannot regulate any longer when run and funded by pharma cartel.
They just do what they're told by the military who do what they're told.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/i-was-interviewed-by-clayton-morris/comment/12064675
Joomi, thank you so much!! 💖😇
I actually began the compilation trying to find case reports of myocarditis & clotting that were available while the FDA was still saying "nothing to see here" about both (& they're still denying clotting lol)
I was expecting t maybe find 50, 100 overall - case reports are rare in the best of times, and back then the anti-anti-vaccine pressures & censorship were in their glorious heyday.
Once I got past 200 - easily - it became a project of how many are actually out there - with massive #'s of case reports, you can do a lot more with them, both to help clinicians treating vaccine injuries, and different types of analyses.
What you said about the advantages of case reports studies over other types of studies is absolutely true. There is so much you can learn from a detailed, in-depth clinical narrative. They also reveals a lot about the mindset of mainstream medicine, such as the sheer deranged insanity of doctors who "rechallenge" patients AFTER they suffered a SEVERE adverse event/injury from the prior dose.
(I have a running series on these case reports, called "Vaccine Roulette" to try and highlight this blatant, egregious & profound lapse of foundational medical ethics, there are literally dozens and dozens of them. I have a list of CR's queued up for further installments after these:
Part 1: https://ashmedai.substack.com/p/vaccine-roulette-making-outright
Part 2: https://ashmedai.substack.com/p/vaccine-roulette-part-2
Part 3: https://ashmedai.substack.com/p/vaccine-roulette-part-3 )
Anyway, thanks again for posting it, I really appreciate it :))
Fantastic work. I'm curious though, did you do this all by hand, copying and pasting into the spreadsheet?
I wish my scripting skills were up to snuff, as I think something like autohotkey or a webscraper could have helped made this effort a bit less tedious.
Great job substackers. 💪🏽. Our public health agencies have fallen on their face.
Thank you, Joomi!
Great crosspost drawing attention to Ash's tireless and all consuming work. 🙏🙏🙏👍 He hasn't gotten the attention that he deserves, but he has been just as dedicated and accurately detailed as Jess Rose, Midwestern Doc, Metatron, Matt Crawford, Igor, El Gato, Katherine Watt and Dr Arkamedic.
Ashmedi' s is a solid cat.😎😁🙏
Humble apologies for not including Modern Discontent in the above salute. Outstanding work as well.😉😁😁
If 10 people died from tainted peanut butter or romaine lettuce, the FDA would do a nationwide recall.
Science begins with observations.
Case reports are observations.
The FDA is financed in large part by Big Pharma.
They are beholden to Big Pharma.
Big Pharma rewards their most compliant servants in government with lucrative executive positions in a grand revolving door scheme.
This incestuous relationship means that nothing the FDA puts out is trustworthy and must be discounted until proven by other, non-biased sources.
To put it bluntly, the FDA (as well as the CDC) are generally boldfaced liars putting out dangerous disinformation designed to benefit Big Pharma and harmful to the public until proven otherwise!
They consistently downplay the value of case reports in their attempt to obfuscate the truth about the danger and ineffectiveness of toxic pharmaceutical products.
To get to the "truth" of any health issue demands research into alternative sources.
Pharma were told by the DOD to churn out the jabs. No trials req'd.
WoW!
That is some hard work right there!
Thank you for sharing Joomi, I'll do the same!
This list is very important: https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=82491CE1A4498377!45488&ithint=file%2cxlsx&authkey=!AHJ7edo5miV35wc
More information on the private military Contractors hired to work on VAERS here: https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/foiad-contracts-show-cdc-expected
<3 Josh!!
Great work. Answers and questions could be found in each individual case of the suffering of an individual human being that are hidden when aggregated into statistics.
Oh... Great resource, thanks.