13 Comments
Nov 7, 2023Liked by Joomi Kim

For more context:

-Other early NLP biodistribution studies showing widescale biodistribution:

-Aussie: https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf

-Acuitas: https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M4_4223_185350.pdf

-Astra Zeneca: https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/2022-10-24-IR0751D_Production_MHRA_000001-000166-166-pages.pdf#page=36

-There was a european mice study also showing wide biodistribution but I can't find it right now :(

The auto-immune responses also show widescale biodistribution:

-This paper showed "Solid immuno-histopathological evidence demonstrates that the COVID-19 genetic vaccines can display a wide distribution within the body, affecting tissues that are terminally differentiated and far away from the injection site. These include the heart and brain, which may incur in situ production of spike protein eliciting a strong autoimmunological inflammatory response. "

-https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08916934.2023.2259123

And this paper "provide evidence that vaccination induces autoimmunity and summarize possible mechanisms of action, such as molecular mimicry, activation by bystanders, and adjuvants."

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108562/

Plus the breast milk transmission:

-https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(23)00366-3/fulltext#%20

Expand full comment

Thank you for the links, very useful.

Expand full comment

excellent

Expand full comment

This is the biodistribution study from Moderna/Spikevax https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/JW-v-HHS-Biodistribution-Prod-4-02418-pgs-291-303.pdf

And also there is a new video out, which has been shared by a Nobel Prize winner on X/Twitter claiming that the LNPs get taken up by Dendritic Cells... that video is aimed at High school students. (https://ghostfromthefuture.substack.com/p/peddlers-of-misinformation-vaccinemakersorg)

And have you heard of this study yet? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367460284_Chemical-physical_criticality_and_toxicological_potential_of_lipid_nanomaterials_contained_in_a_COVID-19_mRNA_vaccine

Expand full comment
Nov 7, 2023Liked by Joomi Kim

Wow. Excellent work

Expand full comment
Nov 7, 2023Liked by Joomi Kim

Very interesting and troubling article, thank you for thinking about the poor mice being subjected to these tests.

Expand full comment

In the Pfizer and Moderna gold-standard randomized clinical trials (the only truly unbiased mortality data on the vaccines), the vaccine groups had 45% excess cardiovascular-related deaths compared to the placebo groups, and the net effect was "4 killed for every 3 saved" even at the height of the pandemic.

COVID deaths: 2 vaccine vs. 5 placebo (-60%)

non-COVID deaths: 29 vaccine vs. 25 placebo (+16%)

cardiovascular deaths: 16 vaccine vs. 11 placebo (+45%)

Overall: 4 more non-COVID deaths, 3 less COVID deaths (4 KILLED FOR EVERY 3 SAVED)

Pfizer: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345/suppl_file/nejmoa2110345_appendix.pdf – Table S4

Moderna: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2113017/suppl_file/nejmoa2113017_appendix.pdf – Table S26

Summary paper: https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(23)00810-6

Layperson summary of the clinical trial mortality results here: https://dailysceptic.org/2022/04/09/covid-vaccines-increase-risk-of-heart-related-deaths-by-up-to-50-lancet-analysis-of-trial-data-finds/. Of course their writing style is slightly sensationalist, but what matters is the actual numbers from the clinical trials, and their numbers are correct.

Expand full comment

Typical Harma product. Relative risk is amplified and used as justification. They conveniently never mention that you are far more exposed to a hundred worse outcomes as compared to whatever you are “treating”. Hey Harma, fix a root cause for once.

Expand full comment
Nov 7, 2023·edited Nov 7, 2023

Yes, and it's almost always relative risk of an UNIMPORTANT or SHORT-SIGHTED outcome. Almost never do they focus on all-cause mortality or even all-cause hospitalization (because a large percentage of Big Pharma products are essentially useless or even COUNTERPRODUCTIVE for all-cause mortality or hospitalization).

Expand full comment

Once again, in love with your concise prose.

Expand full comment

"another nail in the coffin for those who claim that the mRNA vaccines stay at the injection site"

... next to Ugur Sahin, in a video, bragging to a bunch of people how they optimized the juice to reach the lymph nodes well.

What would the wonderjuice even _do_ conceivably useful, if staying in a muscle? @ the biologist, I have no clue ;)

Expand full comment

It’s important to remember that even if your brain explodes within 15 seconds after the jab, that injury will be mild and self correcting. $cience people, $cience

Expand full comment

Don't forget the high number of persons demonstrating myocardial injury (usually transient) after vaccination as determined by high sensitivity troponin concentration. Among 777 participants, median age 37 years, 69.5% women, 40 participants (5.1% [95%CI, 3.7%-7.0%]) had elevated hs-cTnT concentration on day 3 and mRNA-1273 vaccine-associated myocardial injury was adjudicated in 22 participants (2.8% [95%CI, 1.7%-4.3%]) See Buergin N, Lopez-Ayala P, Hirsiger JR, Mueller P, Median D, Glarner N, Rumora K, Herrmann T, Koechlin L, Haaf P, Rentsch K, Battegay M, Banderet F, Berger CT, Mueller C. Sex-specific differences in myocardial injury incidence after COVID-19 mRNA-1273 Booster Vaccination. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Jul 20. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2978. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37470105.

Expand full comment