Of course we know very little about it! These substances are bio-chemical poisons that have no legal requirement to be produced as described on the labels or advertised by manufacturers and government. Thus it is silly to ascribe any known mechanism of action to them. In addition, the shipped vials can contain, legally, any adulteration that the DOD wants to introduce, and can be shipped new or from prior decades of stock of the Strategic National Stockpile (used to be bioweapons stockpile by got renamed by Congress).
After having dosed billions of people with the poisons and the opportunity to perform millions of autopsies one would hope the experts could figure out their mechanisms of action. (Does the Pentagon, the FDA and the NIH know but aren't telling us?)
The experts can't find an exit from a paper bag, so I wouldn't hold my breath :) Somebody in the CIA/NSA/DARPA/DTRA/BARDA might know, but need to be "incentivized" to tell.
Yes, right up there with deliberately working to make zoonotic viruses more infectious to humans. (Whether or not this was the case with this particular pandemic, it still floors me that NO action whatsoever has been taken to stop, or even LIMIT, such ongoing research.)
yeah, it's like there are two realities: The one that you and I know to be true, and the one that our "smart" friends believe to be true. Their sources of info--MSM, FDA, CDC, and Pharma--tell them mRNA is a miracle and saved millions of lives. And they believe them. We know MSM, FDA, CDC, and Pharma are lying and we have our own data sources that support that conclusion. They believe our sources are fake news, and we know their sources are lies and propaganda. How will this ever get resolved?
This is most likely 100% true. At least, the only Covid-19 vaccinated individuals I know who are willing to even entertain the notion that these vaccines might possibly, sometimes, cause harm, are those who directly experienced adverse effects themselves. And even they are "wobbly" about it. The cognitive dissonance is so great, it seems like a mental earthquake: the ground they believe they are standing on sliding out from under them.
Yes, they just may not be able to face that; and honestly, that is quite understandable. But to prevent even more damage being done in the future, it will be of extreme importance to make sure that the full extent of the ineffectivenes and hazards of mRNA inoculations is widely aired, otherwise there is no hope of controlling the juggernaut of further mRNA inoculations.
I would be very much interested in the uptake and expression by Endothelial cells. There is a study looking at how likely you are to suffer from Retinal Vascular Occlusion after getting jabbed. And even 2 years later you have a risk that is double that of unvaccinated people. Which makes me think, that there is something fishy going on in terms of Endotheliitis and micro clotting. And if people damaged their endothelial lining of their blood vessels, that is basically reducing their life expectancy, cause that damage can easily lead to tissue and organ damage down the line. In terms of the very fine blood vessels of the eye it can raise the risk of going blind. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00661-7
From what I've seen there appears to be uptake of spike by endothelial cells. I've wavered between whether all of this is autoimmune, directly spike-related, or peripheral to spike although it's likely to be a mix of all depending on the individual and other factors.
Nonetheless, I think there's pretty good evidence of vascular endothelial targeting, and it's possible that some of the adverse reactions seen with certain organs or regions may be related more to the endothelial problems. With the brain some of the evidence suggests that targeting of vascular endothelial within the brain may alter microglial activity, as well as protein expression which may be the explanation for the brain fog and neurocognitive complications being seen.
“The main point is this: we do not understand fundamental things about what happens after mRNA vaccines are injected into people.” And that was clear from the beginning to those of us who applied a modicum of critical thinking, for how could anyone describe Nan experimental drug as “safe and effective” when the normal 10 years of research was compressed to just 10 months. “Ah”, the propaganda pushers will say, “but they have been researching this tech for a decade or more”. Yes and it singularly failed in its primary focus as a cancer treatment because it, wait for it, unacceptable toxicity from multiple doses. We may imagine the Chief Vet “Albert Bourla” cooking up a scheme to apply the toxic melange to a single dose usage, “hey what about vaccines” and hey presto... And the Pfizer clinical trials fell way short of standards and even before the whistle blowers one could see the fatal flaw, the reliance and propagation of the Relative Risk Reduction metric at 95% over the Absolute Risk Reduction metric at 0.88%. No surprise that we saw virtually zero real benefit in real world usage.
Set all this aside for a bit and ask yourself, as I did in early 2021, how could it possibly be declared safe when no long term safety studies has been done. This was pure PsyOps and an outright lie, with zero scientific basis. If the thing was effective but kills too many people the cost benefit is not there, especially if it saved geriatrics and kills babies (and it is). Early on independent people stated doing research on the vax and there was a steady flow studies released that showed clearly that we didn’t know anything about this tech (or did we, because the Pfizer docs later released did show some of this stuff, which explains why Pfizer and Moderna were not doing any further research, they already knew and didn’t want the truth out for 75 years!).
So the main point is that we knew, or ought to have known that this was junk and dangerous junk from the get go and public health and regulation didn’t care... They don’t care about public health, at all. Let that sink in for a moment...
I think it's interesting that mRNA has been looked at extensively with respect to BioNTech. Some people have remarked that Spikevax has fewer adverse reactions which is rather strange. I haven't kept up with the literature with respect to Spikevax so I'm unsure if that may be biases based on reporting. It would be interesting, given these findings, if the death of cells just happened to prevent spike production and the cascade of events afterward? Although now I've moved more towards the argument that adaptive immunity should deal with circulating spike for most people at this point.
I think the clearest question this study would raise would be the widespread uptake of LNPs, as it would infer that specific cell types would be possible targets. This may not explain the widespread targeting being reported, possibly as it concerns uptake by cells.
Please stop questioning the greatest miracle in medical history. 47 gabillion, jillion, quadrupazillion lives were saved. Rochelle told me so and I believe it.
This was basically assured even before they were used. Different cells and different cellular metabolic rates means all mRNA "vaccines" amount to an uncontrolled dosage of spike from shot to shot, patient to patient, etc..
"For example, we saw that the Pfizer vaccine led to less spike protein expression, and yet there are studies that seem to show that the efficacy between Pfizer and Moderna are similar (example here). How could that be?"
Health Canada Says Authorized Moderna's Spikevax BA.4/5 Bivalent COVID Vaccine For Use As A Booster Dose In Children And Adolescents 6 To 17 Years Of Age (18.05.23 Reuters)
Interesting re. the bone marrow thing as reportedly the Queen had a form of bone marrow cancer leading up to her death. She promoted the jab here in the UK but she and Philip both seemed to go down hill after they were injected.
Of course we know very little about it! These substances are bio-chemical poisons that have no legal requirement to be produced as described on the labels or advertised by manufacturers and government. Thus it is silly to ascribe any known mechanism of action to them. In addition, the shipped vials can contain, legally, any adulteration that the DOD wants to introduce, and can be shipped new or from prior decades of stock of the Strategic National Stockpile (used to be bioweapons stockpile by got renamed by Congress).
After having dosed billions of people with the poisons and the opportunity to perform millions of autopsies one would hope the experts could figure out their mechanisms of action. (Does the Pentagon, the FDA and the NIH know but aren't telling us?)
The experts can't find an exit from a paper bag, so I wouldn't hold my breath :) Somebody in the CIA/NSA/DARPA/DTRA/BARDA might know, but need to be "incentivized" to tell.
Thanks Joomi. If I hadn't lost my job for fighting against mandates, I would be a paid subscriber. When I win my case, I'll upgrade ✊
mRNA vaccines will go down in history as one of the stupidest, most arrogant things human beings have ever done.
Yes, right up there with deliberately working to make zoonotic viruses more infectious to humans. (Whether or not this was the case with this particular pandemic, it still floors me that NO action whatsoever has been taken to stop, or even LIMIT, such ongoing research.)
agree, that one is incredibly stupid and arrogant as well.
Yet all my “smart” friends are convinced they were a miracle. Sigh
yeah, it's like there are two realities: The one that you and I know to be true, and the one that our "smart" friends believe to be true. Their sources of info--MSM, FDA, CDC, and Pharma--tell them mRNA is a miracle and saved millions of lives. And they believe them. We know MSM, FDA, CDC, and Pharma are lying and we have our own data sources that support that conclusion. They believe our sources are fake news, and we know their sources are lies and propaganda. How will this ever get resolved?
Doubtful that it will. Once you push the needle in, you have to deny deny deny. Confronting the horrible reality is far too painful.
This is most likely 100% true. At least, the only Covid-19 vaccinated individuals I know who are willing to even entertain the notion that these vaccines might possibly, sometimes, cause harm, are those who directly experienced adverse effects themselves. And even they are "wobbly" about it. The cognitive dissonance is so great, it seems like a mental earthquake: the ground they believe they are standing on sliding out from under them.
Imagine having to admit to poisoning yourself and your loved ones. Over a flu.
Yes, they just may not be able to face that; and honestly, that is quite understandable. But to prevent even more damage being done in the future, it will be of extreme importance to make sure that the full extent of the ineffectivenes and hazards of mRNA inoculations is widely aired, otherwise there is no hope of controlling the juggernaut of further mRNA inoculations.
I would be very much interested in the uptake and expression by Endothelial cells. There is a study looking at how likely you are to suffer from Retinal Vascular Occlusion after getting jabbed. And even 2 years later you have a risk that is double that of unvaccinated people. Which makes me think, that there is something fishy going on in terms of Endotheliitis and micro clotting. And if people damaged their endothelial lining of their blood vessels, that is basically reducing their life expectancy, cause that damage can easily lead to tissue and organ damage down the line. In terms of the very fine blood vessels of the eye it can raise the risk of going blind. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00661-7
From what I've seen there appears to be uptake of spike by endothelial cells. I've wavered between whether all of this is autoimmune, directly spike-related, or peripheral to spike although it's likely to be a mix of all depending on the individual and other factors.
Nonetheless, I think there's pretty good evidence of vascular endothelial targeting, and it's possible that some of the adverse reactions seen with certain organs or regions may be related more to the endothelial problems. With the brain some of the evidence suggests that targeting of vascular endothelial within the brain may alter microglial activity, as well as protein expression which may be the explanation for the brain fog and neurocognitive complications being seen.
“The main point is this: we do not understand fundamental things about what happens after mRNA vaccines are injected into people.” And that was clear from the beginning to those of us who applied a modicum of critical thinking, for how could anyone describe Nan experimental drug as “safe and effective” when the normal 10 years of research was compressed to just 10 months. “Ah”, the propaganda pushers will say, “but they have been researching this tech for a decade or more”. Yes and it singularly failed in its primary focus as a cancer treatment because it, wait for it, unacceptable toxicity from multiple doses. We may imagine the Chief Vet “Albert Bourla” cooking up a scheme to apply the toxic melange to a single dose usage, “hey what about vaccines” and hey presto... And the Pfizer clinical trials fell way short of standards and even before the whistle blowers one could see the fatal flaw, the reliance and propagation of the Relative Risk Reduction metric at 95% over the Absolute Risk Reduction metric at 0.88%. No surprise that we saw virtually zero real benefit in real world usage.
Set all this aside for a bit and ask yourself, as I did in early 2021, how could it possibly be declared safe when no long term safety studies has been done. This was pure PsyOps and an outright lie, with zero scientific basis. If the thing was effective but kills too many people the cost benefit is not there, especially if it saved geriatrics and kills babies (and it is). Early on independent people stated doing research on the vax and there was a steady flow studies released that showed clearly that we didn’t know anything about this tech (or did we, because the Pfizer docs later released did show some of this stuff, which explains why Pfizer and Moderna were not doing any further research, they already knew and didn’t want the truth out for 75 years!).
So the main point is that we knew, or ought to have known that this was junk and dangerous junk from the get go and public health and regulation didn’t care... They don’t care about public health, at all. Let that sink in for a moment...
I think it's interesting that mRNA has been looked at extensively with respect to BioNTech. Some people have remarked that Spikevax has fewer adverse reactions which is rather strange. I haven't kept up with the literature with respect to Spikevax so I'm unsure if that may be biases based on reporting. It would be interesting, given these findings, if the death of cells just happened to prevent spike production and the cascade of events afterward? Although now I've moved more towards the argument that adaptive immunity should deal with circulating spike for most people at this point.
I think the clearest question this study would raise would be the widespread uptake of LNPs, as it would infer that specific cell types would be possible targets. This may not explain the widespread targeting being reported, possibly as it concerns uptake by cells.
Please stop questioning the greatest miracle in medical history. 47 gabillion, jillion, quadrupazillion lives were saved. Rochelle told me so and I believe it.
I'm already on my 46th booster 🤣
You are the science bruv!!!!
This was basically assured even before they were used. Different cells and different cellular metabolic rates means all mRNA "vaccines" amount to an uncontrolled dosage of spike from shot to shot, patient to patient, etc..
Also: Were you aware of the International COVID Summit that was held in the European Parliament on the 9th of May this year?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFLPWWCAHfQ Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ93mW_sMPo Part 2
This is an interesting study regarding both native Wuhan & vax spike translation:
The Functional Consequences of the Novel Ribosomal Pausing Site in SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein RNA
https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/12/6490
"For example, we saw that the Pfizer vaccine led to less spike protein expression, and yet there are studies that seem to show that the efficacy between Pfizer and Moderna are similar (example here). How could that be?"
Who knows...
https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-illusion-of-vaccine-efficacy
They do not "work" in the sense of vaccination. That much we know.
Who cares anymore.
Health Canada Says Authorized Moderna's Spikevax BA.4/5 Bivalent COVID Vaccine For Use As A Booster Dose In Children And Adolescents 6 To 17 Years Of Age (18.05.23 Reuters)
...certainly not the fu****s in charge.
Thank you for the excellent detail! And appreciate the references, as always.
Interesting re. the bone marrow thing as reportedly the Queen had a form of bone marrow cancer leading up to her death. She promoted the jab here in the UK but she and Philip both seemed to go down hill after they were injected.
https://www.heart.co.uk/news/royals/queen/cause-of-death-bone-marrow-cancer/
.
The Department Of Homeland Security
Has Issued A Safety Warning:
That Terrorists
Might Stop Playing Golf On Wednesdays.
.