mRNA technology shows great promise on ways to thin out the human population in a controlled manner. The Nobel Prize committee is remaining true to their early record of supporting eugenics.
Over 26 prizes have been awarded to public figures supporting eugenics, the most outspoken being Alexis Carrel (1912), George Bernard Shaw (1925) and William B. Shockley (1956).
Sometimes the Nobel committee gets it right. Ivermectin is a miracle drug. PCR is pretty cool(not to be used as a test for anything). 95% of Nobel prizes are shit.
I have two reactions. The first is, if the statues of famous people who held the wrong opinions by current standards must come down, then surely the Nobel prizes should be revoked also.
Second, is that shock therapy seems somewhat reminiscent of the barbaric lobotomy.
One keeps hearing periodically about the resurgence of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT). I know people who reported success with receiving the treatment for depression. Are we to ignore what common sense tells us about using such a blunt instrument to treat a condition arising in a sensitive, highly evolved, complex organ?
Antonio Egas Moniz is one very scary looking man! But his story is even scarier. The poor people that were his victims, they had lives to live and enjoy but it was stolen from them so that he could experiment for his own personal and professional curiosity. We seem to be living through a similar story in that many people have been irreversibly damaged only this time it is an experimental injection.
These posts reference two great articles that the average person can comprehend and highlighted the caveats associated with the experimental mRNA technology very early on.
This was a very necessary reminder of what the Nobel Prize really is, not what we are propagandized to believe. I have no idea how Joomi writes such in-depth and timely written pieces.
mRNA technology shows great promise on ways to thin out the human population in a controlled manner. The Nobel Prize committee is remaining true to their early record of supporting eugenics.
Over 26 prizes have been awarded to public figures supporting eugenics, the most outspoken being Alexis Carrel (1912), George Bernard Shaw (1925) and William B. Shockley (1956).
Sometimes the Nobel committee gets it right. Ivermectin is a miracle drug. PCR is pretty cool(not to be used as a test for anything). 95% of Nobel prizes are shit.
I have two reactions. The first is, if the statues of famous people who held the wrong opinions by current standards must come down, then surely the Nobel prizes should be revoked also.
Second, is that shock therapy seems somewhat reminiscent of the barbaric lobotomy.
One keeps hearing periodically about the resurgence of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT). I know people who reported success with receiving the treatment for depression. Are we to ignore what common sense tells us about using such a blunt instrument to treat a condition arising in a sensitive, highly evolved, complex organ?
Antonio Egas Moniz is one very scary looking man! But his story is even scarier. The poor people that were his victims, they had lives to live and enjoy but it was stolen from them so that he could experiment for his own personal and professional curiosity. We seem to be living through a similar story in that many people have been irreversibly damaged only this time it is an experimental injection.
Make Nobel Prizes irrelevant by ignoring them.
Time to rename to the dumbell prize??
Thank you for mentioning the article "The Tangled History of mRNA vaccines". I believe it is a must read for all, and the focus of my post: https://leemuller.substack.com/p/but-is-it-experimental
Another simply-put article from Forbes, " AlphaFold Is The Most Important Achievement In AI—Ever", I would also recommend for all is featured here:
https://leemuller.substack.com/p/no-we-should-not-all-get-vaccinated
These posts reference two great articles that the average person can comprehend and highlighted the caveats associated with the experimental mRNA technology very early on.
Interesting. They say "of effective mRNA vaccines". Where's the "safe and"? Did they forget their line? Surely, this doesn't mean anything?
This was a very necessary reminder of what the Nobel Prize really is, not what we are propagandized to believe. I have no idea how Joomi writes such in-depth and timely written pieces.
A sincere thanks for your work 🙏
You were thinking lobotomies...
...I was thinking Zyklon B