26 Comments

Darn, Joomi!

I've been thinking of writing a series on viral parkinsonism after your case report on the septuagenarian with pre-diagnosed Parkinson's being exacerbated by the vaccines but shelved that. It appears you were able to get to many of those points! Ironically, I'm also looking a bit at the microbiome in my recent posts, so maybe hold off before you dive deeper into that first! 😉

There's a lot going on right now that seems very scary, but under many circumstances the fear can override rational thought. If context is removed then it's easy to see things from only one perspective.

Many things would need to be looked deeper, and we do need to find answers but we also require a lot of context when examining information.

Expand full comment

Never discount neurotoxicity from the GP120 inserts in S1, that easily crosses the blood brain barrier and doesn't require live virus.

It can persist in the axon for decades and inhibit neuron function without killing it.

I will update this review in the next couple of days with a contents and new research:

Pathophysiology of "brain fog"

https://doorlesscarp953.substack.com/p/pathophysiology-of-spike-protein

Expand full comment

Given that plant viruses can induce both growth and restriction in plant cells, leading to all manner of tissue differentiation ("disturbances") one has to wonder if plant virus genes should be thought of any differently from endogenous plant genes that regulate differentiation. There's no reason why plant genes wouldn't come from viruses and vice-versa.

Likewise for insects (metamorphosis) and animals (embryogenesis). If papilloma viruses can direct cells to divide, then they might be related to ancient versions of the same genes that we use to do the same. All of our genes could be a symphony of ancient viruses.

Expand full comment

How many had taken the covid death shots?

Expand full comment

Thanks for giving this context! 👍🏽💕

Expand full comment

Yes!!!!👏👏👏💯

Couple of points- the lack of detection of SarsCov2 in the brain, despite apparent infection/distribution elsewhere, the body will protect the organs most required for life, even to the perceived detriment on other areas. Also anything that affect CNS or specifically vagus nerve (which SarsCov2 does) generally exhibit "neurological symptoms". Be it as simple as lowered GABA and subsequent side effects in response.

There are differences in distribution data between wild type SarsCov2 infection and "SarsCov2 vaccine" distribution.

Finally, your discussion and suggestions on plant biogy are spot on. In fact so much so, that when you look at certain microbes within the soils that have been systematically destroyed from conventional and even organic agriculture practices, we find that it affects the animals that consume vegetable matter grown in these depleted soils (Or the secondary consumption of animals consuming this matter), so much so that specific brain chemicals are dysregulated or even not produced at all. Which when combined with inside lifestyles and the purposeful layering of sunblock, lowers the photonic electrical gradient within cells and lowers the bodies ability to keep even commensal or non-pathogenic microbes in check, or the inflammation caused by the bodies own cellular mechanisims. Food for thought....perhaps the presence of SarsCov2 would have never even made a blip, if the worlds populations (particularly westernised countries), hadnt already had compromised eco and microbiome systems.🤔🤔😐🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤯

Expand full comment

What is less well known is the fact that we have an intrinsic relationship with viruses just as we do with the bacteria and fungi, etc., of our microbiome. Our ever-present virus population is called the "virome". Here is an article that discusses it:

The human virome: assembly, composition and host interactions | Nature Reviews Microbiology

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-021-00536-5

Expand full comment

Hi Joomi,

I find something very interesting about all of this. It seems quite astonishing to me to make the statement "well it may just be dead viruses", when they observe residues of genetic material that are related to viral infections, with no pathophysiological activity within the tissues where they are found, and in sufficient quantities. As you pointed out from one of the papers "we found few histopathologic changes, despite substantial viral burden".

What this reveals, from my point of view, is that we do not understand the dynamics of those biological structures within the human ecosystem, or within the ecosystem in general. That is, we have a very deep gap in knowledge in relation to etiology, pathophysiology and omics (where I would include virology).

We seem to just jump into conclusions based on narratives, prejudice and superstition.

Expand full comment

I would love to see studies of all the "died suddenly" bodies and what they have in common, and what might have been a causal factor. Is there a list of these? Please provide.

Expand full comment

They keep saying they found a virus when they just found RNA...

Expand full comment

Couple of thoughts, are we sure every injection contains the same material, and is it possible that through the decades people have been experimenting on the populace using common cold virus?

Expand full comment

Indeed, the initial studies i looked at were not necessarily in vivo and did not model natural infections. Now we can pretty clearly see that regular infections of current strains that dont progress to viremia are probably nothing to worry about neurologically. however, the zero dose-control bolus of transfections,repeated multiple times per year? that's a recipe for disaster...

Expand full comment

Now, if I could make that plant grow on my fur, to give me better sun protection, that would be next level.

Expand full comment